Guess you can tell, I've been pondering a lot about culture lately. What it means to have a Western culture, why it's valuable, if it's worth keeping as a distinct entity. And if we don't, what happens when we lose it.
That's why a couple posts at Tam's place struck a nerve today.
First, the thing about the end goal of humanities instruction basically being to become an instructor oneself. It does sound absurd.. but wait a moment. There's an honest to gosh reason for some of that - two thousand plus years of cultural heritage rests in the minds of the (good) teachers, and that's something that needs to be replaced as each generation passes. Think of it as the secular version of apostolic succession*. Sure you can learn from a book - but without the experience of a lifetime in the field, it's too easy to ignore some critical piece of context that colors the whole conclusion you come to.
(Washington, the Whisky Rebellion, and the Terror came to mind there).
So yes, there's a good reason for the prof to want to hold on to the few truly "love the subject" kids to be profs themselves someday. That's how we keep our heritage alive**.
Heck... our ancestors knew this. They knew if you want to break a rebellious people, you fracture their sense of an independent identity. That I learned from the harp classes - how in 17th century Ireland, Elizabeth I had harps burned and harpers killed, so as to destroy the native oral culture. A hundred-some years later, Scotland's tartans and pipes came under similar laws. Heck, we did it in our Indian schools - take away your enemy's children and raise them yourself in your own culture. A few generations later, ease up on the trappings and color - let them have back their tartan or their language or whatnot, once it becomes an expression not of independence and rebelliousness but regional/cultural pride alone.
It's been done and done and done... because it works.
So back to square one this morning.
What does it mean to have a Western culture? A distinct American culture? Is it being attacked? If so, what would replace it? Is it worth defending? If so - how to do that?
More later. Time to participate in another trapping of modern western culture. Getting out of the house on time time to be at work.
------------
* Just using it as an example. Apostolic Succession as a doctrine is worthy of a whole diary entry on its own someday. Probably not any time soon though.
** The number of kids pushed towards that tradition, and the composition of the modern canon? That's another subject, and will get its own post soon.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

2 comments:
I've lived a very long and rough life. I have a lot of shall we say worldly experience with many cultures.
After nearly 6 decades on this rock, I still cannot give an honest answer to the question your post seems to imply.
I can suggest several books that might give a young person like yourself some ideas that may help you find the answers you seek.
I'd suggest the following books by Ayn Rand.
"We The Living"
"The Fountainhead"
"Atlas Shrugged"
For a completely different view I'd also suggest the following books by Daniel Quinn.
"Ishmael"
"The Story of B"
"My Ishmael"
I think they would definitely give a young, intelligent person something to think about. I have a lot fewer days ahead than I do behind so it matters little to me anymore.
I see a rough time ahead for all of human kind if something does not change drastically and very soon. I'm not talking about the kind of change that our newly elected Messiah is selling either.
Interesting blog you have here. I'll be back if I am welcome. If I am not, just say so and I won't bother you again.
Joe
Thank you!
I suppose I do need to take another dive into Rand at some point. Last time I tried it was just..so...dense... I gave up a couple chapters in. Good motivation to give her another try, thank you!
The Quinn... interesting. How appropriate I just finished the Rosseau section of that "Philosophy in 150 pages" survey. From my own (admittedly limited) exposure to bush living and suchlike, I'm inclined to come down on the "nasty brutish and short" side of the argument of pre-industrial civilization.
It's easy to romanticize the lifestyle of the Noble Savage - at least until you have an infected wound four hundred miles from a hospital.
I daresay you're right though, and there's a very good chance a good many of those hoping for some ideal romanticized post-industrial society will get a bigger taste of it than they ever expected, and it won't look so pretty up close.
And of course you're welcome here. Thanks for stopping by. :)
Post a Comment